| MAGAZINE |
| Current Issue |
| Back Issues |
| MAIN LINKS |
| Home |
| Our Vision |
| DailyDose Blog |
| Feedback Forum |
| FreeFlow |
| Mailing List |
| God's Word |
| Knowing God |
| Links |
| Advertising |
| Contact Us |
| REVIEWS |
| Music |
| Movies |
| Books |
| PARTNERS |
AND THE MORAL OF THE STORY IS...
Abu Ghraib prison has become synonymous with moral decay. Anyone with
half a conscience must be offended, saddened, and even outraged at the
prisoner abuse photos that have filled the newscasts. After all, one
of the chief planks on President Bush's war platform was the moral
corruption of Saddam. American and allied forces entered Iraq to
liberate abused Iraqis and restore freedom to the oppressed citizens.
Enter the abuse photos. How in the world could a "liberating" force
commit such atrocities?
The problem is only compounded by the retaliatory execution of Nick
Berg. His killers claimed that prisoner abuse was the direct cause
of his slaughter. In an instant, the problem was brought home. This
was not a remote issue in a foreign war: there were acute consequences.
These events tell us a lot about morality. Morals are not some elusive
commodity that some nations have and other nations do not. Morals are
the way that people view right and wrong.
For the most part everyone operates under the same moral ideals. We
like to take pride in our Canadian morality: we value things like
human dignity and personal freedom. I am thankful that we are able
to live without fear of governmental persecution. Still, on the main
tenets of morality, we stand united with every other
conscience-following human in the world.
For example, every society believes it is wrong to murder-and every
society determines when it is permissible to break those ideals. We
are rightly abhorred by acts of terrorism: suicide bombers, plane
hijackers, and retaliatory executions. Yet we are quick to justify
the extinguishing of human life under the rallying cry of, "a woman's
right to choose," or "weapons of mass destruction."
It is clear that our country's formation was strongly influenced by
Christian values. The following scripture is inscribed on the
entrances to our parliament buildings: "Give the king thy judgments,
O God, and thy righteousness unto the king's son. He shall have
dominion also from sea to sea and from river unto the ends of the
earth" (Psalm 72:1, 8, KJV). In choosing that scripture, our country's
founders showed that they wanted God to inform the wisdom of Canada's
leader.
This leads many of us to think that Christianity is nothing more than
the best possible moral system. We read Bible stories to our children
and ask, "now what was the moral of that story?"
Take the story of David and Goliath for example. The moral? You don't
have to be big in stature to defeat the giants in your life. It is
a fine message. The difficulty comes when you realize that you could
teach that same moral through a number of different stories.
We could also look at the Golden Rule: "do to others what you would
have them do to you" (Matthew 7:12, NIV). Jesus did not invent this-it
is stated in various ways in every major world religion. Search Google
for "Golden Rule", and you will see what I mean. Morality is not
unique to the Bible. We need to realize that morality is only a
byproduct of Christianity.
Christianity's centre is not found in morals-it is found in a decisive
act. You may have watched Mel Gibson's The Passion recently.
Those few hours of Jesus' life, chronicled graphically by Gibson, are
a picture of Christianity's core. Christians are those who realize
that no matter how high their morals are, they cannot meet the
standards of a perfect God. The death of Jesus-God's Son-paid the
price we owed God for our failures. Christians are those people who
have asked God to forgive them for their failures.
To be sure,
Christianity promotes good moral living-but this is a byproduct...
----> continued